<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.observer.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>NY Observer &gt; miller samuel</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/53669/feed</link>
 <description>Articles from Observer.com</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Buy Now? No, Buy Later</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2008/real-estate/five-areas-youd-be-crazy-buy-least-right-now</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p>Welcome to the buyer's market: Supply is up, demand is down, and prices are teetering. Brokers say buy now – after all, there <em>are</em> deals to be had! But what if you waited?</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Here’s four areas (and one borough) where buyers would be fools to rush in now.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">
1. MANHATTAN<br />
In Manhattan, prices are falling. But several gauges indicate that, in the months ahead, they'll fall even further.</p>
<p>For one, new development – which accounted for 30 percent of sales in the borough last quarter – continues to skew prices, according to the third-quarter market report from Miller Samuel and Prudential Douglas Elliman. <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/2008/real-estate/five-areas-youd-be-crazy-buy-least-right-now">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span></p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2008/real-estate/five-areas-youd-be-crazy-buy-least-right-now#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/real-estate">Real Estate</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/25313">Greenpoint</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/50017">Housing market</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/24787">Long Island City</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/53669">miller samuel</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/50919">Prudential Douglas Elliman</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/24392">South Bronx</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/24281">Williamsburg</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 07:25:35 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Leigh Kamping-Carder</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">77877 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Take That, Hamptons! North Fork Feels Home Price Bounce</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2008/real-estate/price-bump-north-fork-market</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p>As the Hamptons housing market <a href="/2008/real-estate/ho-ho-no-market-tanks-tony-hamptons">tumbled mightily in the third quarter</a>, the North Fork's saw a mild price bounce. The North Fork median sales price was $575,000 in the third quarter, up 10 percent from last year, according to the new Miller Samuel-Douglas Elliman report.
<p>The North Fork, home to a cluster of well-respected wineries and other tourist attractions, lacks the sandy dunes and social cachet of its southern neighbor; but the home price increase, at a time when the Hamptons' declined, could reflect a maturation of the North Fork as a second-home destination. Make no mistake, however: Despite a nearly 20 percent annual drop in the Hamptons' median sales price, to $830,000, it still dwarfed the North Fork's by $255,000. </p>
<p>It’s not all good news in the North Fork, however, though in this market that’s not really terribly startling. (The Miller Samuel numbers reflect deals closed in the three months ending Sept. 30, and therefore don't necessarily reflect the financial crisis.)  <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/2008/real-estate/price-bump-north-fork-market">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span></p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2008/real-estate/price-bump-north-fork-market#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/real-estate">Real Estate</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/24535">Long Island</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/53669">miller samuel</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/56232">north fork</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/50919">Prudential Douglas Elliman</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 12:53:37 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Oliver Haydock</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">77846 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Ho-Ho-NO! Hamptons Housing Prices Tank</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2008/real-estate/ho-ho-no-market-tanks-tony-hamptons</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p>All is not well at the summer playground for America’s rich and famous, as home prices and sales in eastern Long Island tumbled to two-year lows in the third quarter, according to a new Hamptons/North Fork market report from real estate appraisal shop Miller Samuel and brokerage giant Prudential Douglas Elliman.</p>
<p>The quarterly median sales price in the tony vacation enclaves dropped to $729,000, which is the lowest since the fourth quarter of 2006 and 17.3 percent below last year’s median price of $882,000. Third-quarter sales fell from 427 last year to 355 this year, a 16.9 percent plunge, which brought East End market activity to its slowest quarterly pace since Miller Samuel began tracking the area in the second quarter of 2006. <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/2008/real-estate/ho-ho-no-market-tanks-tony-hamptons">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span></p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2008/real-estate/ho-ho-no-market-tanks-tony-hamptons#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/real-estate">Real Estate</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/50017">Housing market</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/58025">luxury housing market</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/53669">miller samuel</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/56232">north fork</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/50919">Prudential Douglas Elliman</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/54639">the hamptons</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 18:16:21 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Oliver Haydock</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">77823 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Manhattan Market Report Now Online </title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2008/real-estate/manhattan-market-report-now-online</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p>The Miller Samuel-Prudential Douglas Elliman third-quarter Manhattan housing report's <a href="http://www.millersamuel.com/reports/pdf-reports/MMO3Q08.pdf">now online (PDF)</a>.
<p>To read about the sagging Manhattan condo market <a href="/2008/real-estate/prices-sales-down-manhattan-condos-0">click here</a>; to read about the troubled luxury market <a href="/2008/real-estate/slow-quarter-luxurious-new-developments">click here</a>.  </p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2008/real-estate/manhattan-market-report-now-online#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/real-estate">Real Estate</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/50017">Housing market</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/53669">miller samuel</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/50919">Prudential Douglas Elliman</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 08:10:29 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Tom Acitelli</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">76513 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Quogue, Quogue! North Fork-Hamptons Report Online</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2008/real-estate/quogue-quogue-north-fork-hamptons-report-online</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p>The second-quarter Miller Samuel-Douglas Elliman report on the North Fork and the Hamptons housing markets is now online <a href="http://www.millersamuel.com/reports/pdf-reports/HNF2Q08.pdf">as a PDF</a>.
<p>Another fun fact! Among the East End's luxury markets, Quogue had the highest average sales price at $15,650,000. Yes, Quogue.  </p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2008/real-estate/quogue-quogue-north-fork-hamptons-report-online#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/real-estate">Real Estate</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/49808">Hamptons</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/50017">Housing market</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/53669">miller samuel</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/56232">north fork</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 15:23:27 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Tom Acitelli</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">72684 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Hamptons Mimic Manhattan with Home Sales Plunge</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2008/real-estate/hamptons-mimic-manhattan-home-sales-plunge</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p>Like in Manhattan (and <a href="/2008/real-estate/williamsburg-greenpoint-lead-brooklyn-home-price-jumps">Brooklyn</a> and <a href="/2008/real-estate/bad-times-biggest-boroughs">Queens</a>), home sales in the Hamptons plunged annually in the second quarter of 2008. At the same time, the average home sales price dropped annually and quarterly as well to $1,730,414, according to a new report from appraisal firm Miller Samuel and brokerage Prudential Douglas Elliman. The report covers closed deals for the quarter ending June 30.
<p>The 26.2 percent sales drop from the second quarter of 2007 mirrors a Manhattan year-over-year drop of 21.8 percent, suggesting the oft-cited symbiosis between the two housing markets. Quarterly Hampton sales, similar to Manhattan's, were up 12.8 percent to 352--that's still well below the 477 recorded in the second quarter last year. <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/2008/real-estate/hamptons-mimic-manhattan-home-sales-plunge">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span></p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2008/real-estate/hamptons-mimic-manhattan-home-sales-plunge#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/real-estate">Real Estate</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/49808">Hamptons</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/50017">Housing market</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/53669">miller samuel</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/50919">Prudential Douglas Elliman</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 19:17:49 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Tom Acitelli</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">72577 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Et Tu, Queens? Home Sales There Plunge, Just Like Manhattan, Brooklyn</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2008/real-estate/bad-times-biggest-boroughs</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p>Home sales in Queens plunged annually from the spring of 2007, according to a new report,  joining Brooklyn and Manhattan in steep year-over-year sales slides.
<p>Queens home sales were down 23.7 percent from the second quarter of 2007 through the second quarter of 2008, to 2,363, according to the report out this week from appraisal firm Miller Samuel and brokerage Prudential Douglas Elliman. The second quarter sales amount--nearly 3,100--represents, apparently, a quarterly peak since 2004.   <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/2008/real-estate/bad-times-biggest-boroughs">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span></p>
<p>A report earlier this month showed Brooklyn home sales plunging 43.6 percent annually. And, in Manhattan, sales dropped 21.8 percent year over year. The reports  tracked deals closed in the quarter ending June 30 (the Manhattan and Brooklyn ones are available <a>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2008/real-estate/bad-times-biggest-boroughs#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/real-estate">Real Estate</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/24352">Brooklyn</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/50017">Housing market</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/53669">miller samuel</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/50919">Prudential Douglas Elliman</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/49998">Queens</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 07:54:16 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Tom Acitelli</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">71974 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Brooklyn&#039;s Busiest Half  </title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2008/real-estate/stat-day-hey-theres-new-mexico</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p>Most of Brooklyn's home sales are happening in South Brooklyn, a slice of the city much less traveled by Manhattanites than the increasingly mirror-image neighborhoods further north. <br /> 
<p>In the first half of 2008, over 53 percent of Brooklyn home sales closed in South Brooklyn, according to a <a href="/2008/real-estate/brooklyn-borough">report (PDF)</a> from appraisal firm Miller Samuel and brokerage Douglas Elliman. </p>
<p>Maybe it's got something to do with the fact that South Brooklyn, unlike its condo-laden neighbors elsewhere, remains awash in houses. &quot;One- to three-family houses account for half the sales in the entire borough,&quot; Jonathan Miller, the report's author, pointed out yesterday.  </p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2008/real-estate/stat-day-hey-theres-new-mexico#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/real-estate">Real Estate</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/24352">Brooklyn</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/50017">Housing market</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/53669">miller samuel</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 17:54:52 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Tom Acitelli</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">71821 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Fresh Round of Recrimination? Manhattan Market Reports Due </title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2008/real-estate/manhattan-market-reports-coming</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p>The second-quarter Manhattan housing market reports will be out by Wednesday morning of next week. Last time they hit, for the first quarter, the reports caused quite the kerfuffle, including internal company e-mails and a <em>New York Times</em> article trying to sort the whole thing out.
<p>Basically, it went like this: Prudential Douglas Elliman and Miller Samuel's report showed a 34 percent annual drop in Manhattan home sales. Brown Harris Stevens and Halstead Property's showed a 5 percent <em>gain</em>. And the Corcoran Group's showed a mere 1 percent drop.</p>
<p>All good and well--different measures by different firms, different numbers.  <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/2008/real-estate/manhattan-market-reports-coming">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span></p>
<p>But! Elliman superbroker Dolly Lenz sent out an <a>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2008/real-estate/manhattan-market-reports-coming#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/real-estate">Real Estate</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/50918">Corcoran Group</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/50017">Housing market</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/53669">miller samuel</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/50919">Prudential Douglas Elliman</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 12:03:30 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Tom Acitelli</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">71332 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Long Island City Condos Boost Housing Prices in Queens</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2008/queens-market-report-sorry-its-boring</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p><span class="xapple-style-span">Sorry, outer-borough bargain-hunters;</span> the median sales price in Queens actually increased slightly to $498,500 in the first quarter of 2008, compared to $492,900 in the same period last year, according to <span class="xapple-style-span">Prudential Douglas Elliman’s Q1 2008 Long Island/Queens Market Report.</span></p>
<p class="xmsonormal">Credit all the new high-end developments coming on-line, not increasing demand, for the price hike.   <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/2008/queens-market-report-sorry-its-boring">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span></p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2008/queens-market-report-sorry-its-boring#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/real-estate">Real Estate</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/53669">miller samuel</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/50919">Prudential Douglas Elliman</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/49998">Queens</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 13:31:34 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Lysandra Ohrstrom</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">67952 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
