<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.observer.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>NY Observer &gt; L.A. Times</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/53266/feed</link>
 <description>Articles from Observer.com</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Los Angeles Times Cuts Staff for Third Time This Year; 10 Percent of Newsroom Let Go</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2008/media/l-times-cuts-staff-third-time-year-10-percent-newsroom-let-go</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p><em>Los Angeles Times</em> staffers have not been blessed with the same good news that the <em>New York Times</em> newsroom <a href="/2008/media/keller-says-no-further-job-cuts-times">received</a> today.</p>
<p><a href="/2008/media/more-job-cuts-expected-l-times">As rumored,</a> Russ Stanton, editor of <em>The Los Angeles Times</em>, announced this morning that 75 people are being laid off. It's the third round of job cuts for the paper <em>this year</em>, and will lower the newsroom head count to about 650 people. Their newsroom had 1,200 people seven years ago.</p>
<p>LA Observed <a href="http://www.laobserved.com/archive/2008/10/another_bad_day_at_1st_an_1.php">has the memo:</a></p>
<blockquote>
<p>Colleagues,</p>
<p>The growing economic downturn is forcing us to undergo another round of job reductions and cost cuts. I deeply regret to report that today, 75 of our friends, colleagues and capable staff members in Editorial will be told that they are losing their jobs.</p>
 <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/2008/media/l-times-cuts-staff-third-time-year-10-percent-newsroom-let-go">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span></p></blockquote>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2008/media/l-times-cuts-staff-third-time-year-10-percent-newsroom-let-go#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/media">Media</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/53266">L.A. Times</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/53281">Russ Stanton</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/people/sam-zell">Sam Zell</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 13:36:09 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>John Koblin</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">77611 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Los Angeles Times Redesigns</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2008/media/l-times-redesigns</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p><a href="/2008/media/peek-redesigned-l-times">As warned,</a> <em>The</em> <em>Los Angeles Times</em> has completed its redesign.</p>
<p>And it is much less splashy than <em>The Chicago Tribune's</em> was.</p>
<p>It's a point that Lee Abrams, the chief innovation director for Tribune, <a href="http://www.laobserved.com/archive/2008/10/lat_redesign_already_has.php">mentioned in a memo</a> to his staffers. "It will be quite a bit less dramatic than our other newspapers, but has some wonderful new elements."</p>
<p>One change included: removing "staff writer" next to a byline and replaced with "Joe Smith / Reporting from London." Today's front-page has a "Reporting from South Africa" tagline on Page 1, clearly a tactical move by Russ Stanton, the paper's editor, demonstrating that, yes, the paper's staff may have been cut in half over the last seven years, but it still has reporters abroad. <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/2008/media/l-times-redesigns">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span></p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2008/media/l-times-redesigns#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/media">Media</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/53266">L.A. Times</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/53281">Russ Stanton</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/people/sam-zell">Sam Zell</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 13:37:13 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>John Koblin</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">77305 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>L.A. Times Endorses Obama</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2008/media/l-times-endorses-obama</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p>It's the <em>L.A. Times'</em> first Democratic <a href="http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/la-ed-endorse19-2008oct19,0,5966124.story">endorsement</a> in a presidential election ever, and the paper's first presidential endorsement since 1972. </p>
<blockquote><p>We may one day look back on this presidential campaign in wonder. We may marvel that Obama's critics called him an elitist, as if an Ivy League education were a source of embarrassment, and belittled his eloquence, as if a gift with words were suddenly a defect. In fact, Obama is educated and eloquent, sober and exciting, steady and mature. He represents the nation as it is, and as it aspires to be.</p>
</p></blockquote>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2008/media/l-times-endorses-obama#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/media">Media</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/people/barack-obama">Barack Obama</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/57826">Jim Newton</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/53266">L.A. Times</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 15:15:18 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>John Koblin</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">77153 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>A Peek at a Redesigned L.A. Times</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2008/media/peek-redesigned-l-times</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p>Kevin Roderick at LA Observed <a href="http://www.laobserved.com/archive/2008/10/la_times_focusgroups_more.php">got his hands</a> on some of the images that<em> Los Angeles Times</em> is handing to focus groups on their proposed redesign. </p>
<p>One thing we noticed (and sort of like): The <em>L.A. Times</em> &quot;staff writer&quot; tagline below a reporter's byline is done; it'll be replaced by something that says, BY NED PARKER / REPORTING FROM BAGHDAD.</p>
<p>It definitely steals something from a TV reporter's handbook, but it still works. </p>
<p>Anyway, the proposed <em>Times'</em> redesign looks a lot more tolerable than the <a href="http://www.newsdesigner.com/archives/002913.php"><em>Chicago Tribune</em></a>'s. </p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2008/media/peek-redesigned-l-times#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/media">Media</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/57683">Kevin Roderick</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/53266">L.A. Times</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/people/sam-zell">Sam Zell</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 14:03:22 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>John Koblin</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">76720 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>More Job Cuts Expected at The L.A. Times</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2008/media/more-job-cuts-expected-l-times</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p>Can it get any worse for <em>The</em> <em>Los Angeles Times</em>?</p>
<p>In a year when the paper has cut far more editorial staffers than any paper in the country, it appears the're not quite done yet.</p>
<p>Keven Roderick at LA Observed <a href="http://www.laobserved.com/archive/2008/10/incredibly_deep_new_cutba.php">is reporting</a> that more job cuts are on the way, and the number could be as high as 75 editorial positions.</p>
<p>Among those expected to lose their job is Leo Wolinsky, the assocate editor of the paper, according to two souces who spoke to Media Mob.</p>
<p>Sources also told us the job cut rumors have been flying for a few weeks now. One source tells us that the number will be about 50 people let go. <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/2008/media/more-job-cuts-expected-l-times">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span></p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2008/media/more-job-cuts-expected-l-times#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/media">Media</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/57609">Eddy Hartenstein</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/53266">L.A. Times</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/53281">Russ Stanton</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 19:14:52 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>John Koblin</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">76510 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>With Help of Monster, Denton&#039;s Gawker Thumps Stanton&#039;s LATimes.com </title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2008/media/dentons-gawker-thumps-stantons-latimes-com</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p>Since <em>The</em> <em>Los Angeles Times</em> decided to lay off 135 people—100+ people for the second time this year—its PR brass has been trying to distract the media with <a href="/2008/media/l-times-press-department-wants-change-subject">other, happier news.</a> Yesterday, with a nice link from Romenesko, the <em>Times</em> announced that it had its biggest Web-traffic month <a href="http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/readers/2008/08/colleagues-we-c.html">ever</a> with 127 million page views in July.</p>
<p>Every piece of publicity that comes out of the paper is issued from Russ Stanton, the paper's editor of six months, who had previously been in charge of latimes.com. Naturally, a lot of it will be latimes.com-related (if it's not about traffic, the news is always about <a href="/2008/make-nice-nikki-l-times-starts-hollywood-blog">new blogs</a>). <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/2008/media/dentons-gawker-thumps-stantons-latimes-com">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span></p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2008/media/dentons-gawker-thumps-stantons-latimes-com#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/media">Media</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/50052">Gawker</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/53266">L.A. Times</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/28304">Nick Denton</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/53281">Russ Stanton</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 12:21:31 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>John Koblin</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">73006 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>L.A. Times Site Goes Down After Earthquake Due to &#039;Heavy Volume&#039;</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2008/media/l-times-site-goes-down-after-earthquake-due-heavy-volume</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p>Shortly after a magnitude-5.8 earthquake hit Los Angeles this afternoon, the <em>L.A. Times</em> Web site went down. Managing editor John Arthur explained in an (obviously dashed off given the circumstances) email to staff: "our website server is staggering because of heavy volume. the page actually has been updated and may load for soe people. keep refreshing."</p>
<p>We're talking to a few <em>Times</em> staffers via IM. Are people freaking out? "not so much on my floor. I was in the cafeteria and saw them filing out. they said it was 'standard,' that we had to [evacuate]. But I went back to my desk to get my cell, and everyone was here," one tapepd in. Another: "everyone is kinda joking now and getting back to work."</p>
<p>And now for the news!</p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2008/media/l-times-site-goes-down-after-earthquake-due-heavy-volume#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/media">Media</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/53266">L.A. Times</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/people/sam-zell">Sam Zell</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 15:07:46 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>John Koblin</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">72542 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>L.A. Times Terminates Sunday Book Review; Is the Opinion Section Next?</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2008/media/l-times-terminates-sunday-book-review-opinion-section-next</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p>Sam Zell and Randy Michaels are about to end the Sunday Book Review at the <em>L.A. Times</em> and book reviews editors past are not pleased about it. Four former editors of the section—Sonja Bolle, Digby Diehl, Jack Miles and Steve Wasserman—wrote in a <a href="http://www.laobserved.com/archive/2008/07/book_editors_protest_cuts.php">joint-letter</a> to L.A. Observed complaining about the decision. </p>
<blockquote><p>To be sure, no section of any newspaper can remain hostage to past ways of covering the news of the day. We are convinced, however, that the way forward is to increase coverage of our literary culture—a culture that every day is more vibrant and diverse in the thriving megalopolis of Los Angeles. <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/2008/media/l-times-terminates-sunday-book-review-opinion-section-next">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span></p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2008/media/l-times-terminates-sunday-book-review-opinion-section-next#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/media">Media</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/55990">Book Review</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/53266">L.A. Times</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/people/sam-zell">Sam Zell</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 13:01:50 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>John Koblin</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">72130 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>The Newsroom-Free L.A. Times Mag Hires Familiar Luxury-Mag Names</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2008/media/newsroom-free-l-times-mag-hires-familiar-luxury-mag-names</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p>The new <em>L.A. Times</em> magazine--a name hasn't been settled yet--plans to go the way of the <em>New York Times' T</em> and <em>WSJ</em> Magazine: it'll be a glossy luxury magazine. Last month, the newspaper's then-publisher, David Hiller, forced the newsroom to <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/10/business/media/10paper.html">surrender control</a> of the magazine to the business side. </p>
<p>Even though Mr. Hiller has since been pushed out of the <em>L.A. Times</em>, the business side is staffing up for their new magazine. Annie Gilbar, who was once a host for a show on the Home Shopping Network and an editor of <em>InStyle</em>, will edit the magazine. WWD <a href="http://www.wwd.com/memopad/article/126578?page=1">reports:</a></p>
<blockquote><p>The editorial team so far includes familiar names in the glossy magazine world, among others: Celebrity stylist Lori Goldstein began as fashion director on July 1 (though she is not working in the office full-time), and several former House &amp; Garden staffers are either on staff or contributing part-time, including former Testy Tastemaker columnist Mayer Rus, contributing food editor Lora Zarubin and contributing senior editor Paul Fortune, according to several sources. <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/2008/media/newsroom-free-l-times-mag-hires-familiar-luxury-mag-names">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span></p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2008/media/newsroom-free-l-times-mag-hires-familiar-luxury-mag-names#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/media">Media</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/55988">Annie Gilbar</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/28932">David Hiller</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/53266">L.A. Times</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 12:37:54 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>John Koblin</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">72126 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>L.A. Times U.N. Reporter, Brauchli&#039;s Wife, Resigned to Help &#039;Save a Body&#039;</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2008/media/l-times-un-reporter-brauchlis-wife-resigned-help-save-body</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p>Newly named <em>Washington Post</em> executive editor Marcus Brauchli's wife, Maggie Farley, the United Nations reporter for the <em>L.A. Times, </em>says she quit right before the paper announced layoffs in order to &quot;save a body.&quot; And, not surprisingly, she doesn't care much for what's happening to the paper. She<a href="http://www.laobserved.com/archive/2008/07/more_times_departures.php"> tells</a> L.A. Observed's Kevin Roderick:</p>
<blockquote><p>&quot;I resigned last week in the hopes that it would save a body, and with all the changes in our family and at the paper, it felt like a good time to leave and try something new. I am proud to have been part of one of the largest and strongest foreign staffs in the country, and am disheartened by what has been done to our great newspaper. <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/2008/media/l-times-un-reporter-brauchlis-wife-resigned-help-save-body">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span></p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2008/media/l-times-un-reporter-brauchlis-wife-resigned-help-save-body#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/media">Media</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/55956">Baltimore Sun</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/53266">L.A. Times</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/55955">Maggie Farley</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/28593">Marcus Brauchli</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/people/sam-zell">Sam Zell</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/50050">The Washington Post</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 11:34:45 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>John Koblin</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">72064 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
