O2

Stuyvesant High School, the Ultimate Meritocracy

This article was published in the August 27, 2007, edition of The New York Observer.

Stuyvesant High School on Chambers Street.
Janet Perr
Stuyvesant High School on Chambers Street.

A CLASS APART: PRODIGIES, PRESSURE AND PASSION INSIDE ONE OF AMERICA’S BEST HIGH SCHOOLS
By Alec Klein
Simon & Schuster, 323 pages, $25

Every fall, 20,000-plus eighth graders with cowlicks or ponytails and an abnormal share of pocket protectors take the most important test of their lives—the Stuyvesant exam. Nothing else matters in competition for the toughest high school ticket in New York. Not grades, not essays, not legacy. You hit the cutoff, you’re in; one point below, forget it. Compared to this test, the stakes involved in the SAT’s that the students will take three years later seem penny ante. For those with financial resources, admission to Stuyvesant is merely a $120,000 savings over the cost of a private school. But for the majority, for whom private school is not an option, it’s the difference between the best education in the world and being thrown into the maw of the Board of Education.

Of those who take the test—and though a few may be entirely deluded, most are appropriately self-selected youngsters who have reason to believe that they have a chance—about 3 percent are admitted. So yes: Stuyvesant is harder to get into than Harvard; to be precise, three times as hard. Stuyvesant’s students are, as journalist and author Alec Klein says, “a class apart.”

Mr. Klein, himself a 1985 Stuyvesant grad, returned to his alma mater to chronicle a year in the life of the school, the faculty and the students. I have no idea whether Mr. Klein looks his age, but he wisely did not attempt to fool anyone by pretending he was a high-school student. He just hung out—though his style of clothing evolved, as did his vocabulary and musical taste.

The 2005-2006 academic year offered the usual milestones on Chambers Street: elections, prom, a football season for the traditionally miserable Peglegs (doomed, perhaps, by being named after the wooden-footed colonial governor of New Amsterdam) and SING!, an annual competition between the grades. In SING!, the students write skits, design and build sets, dance and, of course, sing their hearts out in a gala as glorious as any Broadway opening (though if the seniors don’t win, it’s a shandeh).

Mr. Klein’s chosen year also provided debates about the appropriateness of time cards for teachers and scanners that would register students’ entries and exits from the building. There was a sensationalist cover story in New York magazine about the “Cuddle Puddle” ménage of sexually ambiguous teenagers at Stuy, and also the horrendous death of two students in a car accident.

Mr. Klein follows a number of individuals through the year. There’s Romeo, a half-French, half-African-American football player and math whiz; Mariya, a Ukrainian immigrant whose mother grounds her when her G.P.A. falls to 93.50 (yes, they do calculate down to the second decimal); and Jane, a heroin addict who says, “Self-destruction is really fun.”

Among the adults, Mr. Klein’s (and this reviewer’s) favorites are clearly the mavericks. There’s Eric Grossman, beloved English teacher who teaches Nabokov’s Pale Fire with the incandescence of Harold Bloom and is the only one to almost get through to Jane by saying, “The world’s a much happier place for me with a little freak like you in it”; and Matthew Polazzo whose “existential wanderings” roam from Alexander the Great to the “chemical synthesis of desire” to thoughts about an afterlife (“I’d love to see my dog”). Yet Mr. Grossman wrestles with budget cuts that may force him to fire several members of his staff, and Mr. Polazzo may not be reappointed to his treasured and thankless job as coordinator of student activities.

Above all there’s Daniel Jaye, assistant principal and head of the math department. He allows Milo Beckman, a fifth-grade prodigy, to attend classes taught by Mr. Siwanowicz, a slightly older version of Milo. Mr. Siwanowicz dropped out of City College with a 1.6 G.P.A. after he won a Putnam Fellowship awarded to “the top five undergraduate mathematicians in North America.” In other words, “a student who doesn’t belong is being taught by a teacher who’s not supposed to teach.” Yet Mr. Jaye, who aspires to Stuyvesant’s principalship after 34 years of service, is tempted by the offer of a better-paid job in New Jersey because Stanley Teitel, the tenacious current occupant of the office, refuses to retire.

Mr. Teitel is the Ahab of the book, a gaunt, bearded figure, obsessed with the excellence of the school. Mr. Klein is kind to Mr. Teitel—too kind. The principal invariably comes down on the side of authority and refuses to acknowledge that Stuyvesant is no longer a purely technical bastion. As the jewel of the city system, it now appeals as much to the witty young editors of the school’s humor mag, The Broken Escalator, as to any of its vaunted “mathletes.”

The advantage of Mr. Klein’s September-to-June tempo is that it has its own intrinsic drama. Will Mr. Jaye succumb to temptation? Will Mr. Polazzo be reappointed? Will Romeo get into Harvard? Will Jane conquer her demons? Some questions are answered, some not. Some endings are happy, some not.

Occasionally, Mr. Klein gets a tad windy when discussing Big Issues: how “high school is a microcosm of our society,” or why the students self-segregate into ethnic cliques. He’s at his best when he focuses on the kids themselves; then he writes with pleasant whimsy, following this “awkward assemblage of skin and bones, a mass of puzzle pieces that don’t quite fit together” for whom “friendships are like amoebas, having no definite form.”

There’s no doubt that Stuyvesant is the melting pot at its most inspirational, but it’s still a New York City public school, and some of its teachers are mediocre. It’s the ultimate meritocracy undermined by the ultimate bureaucracy. Yet the students learn how to make it work. For example, though they’re officially not permitted to choose their teachers, they know how to manipulate the system to get into Mr. Grossman’s classes, and Mr. Polazzo’s. Contending with irrational authority provides as much of a life skill as anything one can learn in class. And so does figuring out how to bootleg elevator keys.

Melvin Jules Bukiet is the author of seven books of fiction and editor of three anthologies. He teaches at Sarah Lawrence College.

  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Reddit
  • Newsvine
  • Google
  • Yahoo
  • Technorati
  • Facebook
  • Stumble Upon
  • Netvibes
  • Windows Live

Comments
Post a comment

Irwin (not verified) says:

Are the standards for acceptance to Stuyvesant, relaxed for selected ethnic and racial groupings?

Loki (not verified) says:

Nope. This is one of the reasons why the percentage of black and Latino kids at Stuy is under 5%.

Loopy (not verified) says:

BLS! BLS! Sumus primi!

Zero (not verified) says:

Hmm... so passing the test makes this the best high school in the U.S.? Big deal, I'd win in a debate in high school against these "geniuses" any day.

WR Frank (not verified) says:

When I took that test in the 8th grade it also was for admission to the Bronx High School of Science and Brooklyn Tech.

There has always been a running debate about which of these three high schools is best.

I may be a little biased since I went to the Bronx Science.

Peto (not verified) says:

Estis secundi. Regiani sunt primi!!

Jermaine (not verified) says:

Highest grades get to go to Stuy
second highest, to bronx science
third, brooklyn tech

Anonymous4 (not verified) says:

stuy is one of the best (if not the best) high school not just because of some test. It is the best because of the AMAZING teachers (like Grossman and Polazzo) who push, understand, and joke around with the students, the fact that it allows their students to find themselves, the HUGE amount of school spirit and an AWESOME alumni association (of whom are some incredible members).

Nathan Harela (not verified) says:

The shandeh is that Principal Teitel is not worthy of the school, and DOE does nothing...

Thanks, Nathan

Neal H. Hurwitz (not verified) says:

Thanks to Melvin Bukiet! and
Please see our web site and you can get your copy of Stuyvesant HS: The First 100 Years, 1904-2004, 225pp.

Excellent work!

Thank you!

Neal Hurwitz SHS '62
The Campaign for Stuyvesant/Alumni(ae) & Friends Endowment Fund, Inc.
www.ourstrongband.org
212-222-9112

alumalum (not verified) says:

i graduated from stuyvesant in the 90s after which i went on to Princeton and then grad school at Harvard. Still, NO WHERE, in any of my academic experiences have I found peers as intelligent and incredible as I did when I was at Stuy.

Long live Stuy. Lonng live the its students!

idungradidated (not verified) says:

Zero, you're jealous. Who cares if you could beat the Stuyvesant High School debate team? Congratulations on your massive electronic penis, we're all in awe. As a fairly recent Stuyvesant graduate, I think the mediocrity of the school should be further highlighted. While I do think I met some of the more interesting people I'll meet in my life there, there were certainly idiots in the school too. Not everybody there was smart, but everybody there was pretty good at standardized tests. I only saw one or two pocket protectors. Mr. Polazzo was one of the three best teachers I had in the school, while in my opinion the principal Teitel was a self-important ass desperately trying to preserve the historically spiffy image of a school that in many ways has become a joke. How come no mention of famous math teachers who look homeless, smell like rum in class, and call the Asian students S.A.R.S. #1, 2 & 3?

AL Frick (not verified) says:

That's awfully presumptuous of you. Are you 10 years old or something?

I'd love to see you go up against the mathematics and science knowledge of these kids any day.

Former Alum.

Al Frick (not verified) says:

As a former 90's alumni, I wonder if the entrance standards have gone up since then? It inevitably has to, what with the immigrant parents sending their kids to 15 different test prep programs. Given that the acceptance number is fixed but the pool of applicants has ballooned, the school must indeed raise their cut-off scores.

And by the way, it's not the teachers that made the school good, it was the students. The teachers did not need to "teach down" to accommodate slower students because all of the students there were filtered somewhat into Type A self-starter types. I truly don't believe that the public school system sucks because of the schools and teachers (though some undoubtedly do). It's more the students and the parents who don't encourage them to work or postpone immediate gratification. More money plunked into the system to teachers' unions and computers won't help.

Didn't Gothere (not verified) says:

Don't Hunter High School people fancy their school to be superior to Stuyvesant?

hello (not verified) says:

I went to Stuy and I'm not all that bright. The schools reputation is more hype than well deserved.

StuyAlum (not verified) says:

For the most part, immigrant parents don't send their kids to prep classes. Their ambition is fueled by the need to survive. A lot of it also has to do with cultural obsession with education.

-Immigrant and Stuy Alum

Anonymous Mouse (not verified) says:

An exam taken by 20,000 people and with a 3% admit rate? Pffft, get over yourselves! I took a National High School Entrance exam with 300,000 people, and the best school only took the top 104 scorers (52 males, 52 females, and since males generally scored better, you had to be in the top 70 overall to get in). That's an admit rate of about 0.03%, 100 times more difficult than Stuyvesant.

It's insane how myopic Americans can be.

Anonymous Cat (not verified) says:

Hey, Anonymous Mouse. You didnt qualify whether you made it into your so-called best school. If you feel it was that great, stay there! It's ridiculous how people find fault everywhere else besides their own country!

Irony Monitor (not verified) says:

Wow - an article about education, with almost all of the folk commenting needing some. It's like a meta-article, or sumfink. I'll assume that all the clever ones (Stuy grads or not) are out doing stuff, leaving us dumbasses here wittering, fruitlessly.

Hunterfan (not verified) says:

stuyvesant isn't the best high school in the us. hunter college high school is.

Hunterfan2 (not verified) says:

i am the writer of the previous comment. though my opinion may be biased becauser i currently attend hunter, there are proven charts and info that its better than stuy. the sad fact is that hunter isnt well-known enough as stuy. in fact, hunter is practically the top feeder to ivy league colleges. no bragging or anything intentionally meant, but just trying to make the facts straight.

Jonathan Vos Post (not verified) says:

The year that I graduated Stuyvesant, 1968, the usual 100% of grads were admitted to colleges and universities.

In my year, for the first timne, 3 of us were accepted to, and went to, Caltech, the university with the most selective admissions policy.

My classmate Stev Koonin went on to be Dean of Faculty, then Vice President and provost of Caltech, and is now Chief Scientist of BP, Ltd.

I cannot imagine an academically superior high school, albeit my own son skipped high school completely and megan university at age thirteen.

Jonathan Vos Post (not verified) says:

Time. Beagn.

We didn't need spellcheckers in my day. But that was long ago...

Jonathan Vos Post (not verified) says:

Began. Third time's the charm.

Anyway, we were the first high school to have a cyclotron, and the first to have a mainframe computer.

Hunterfan3 (not verified) says:

Yeah! Go Hunter College High School. The truth is, most of the kids who don't make it into Hunter end up going to Stuyvesant.

Stuy Alum 2000 (not verified) says:

No, the test is given blind and the top 800 or so test takers get in, provided that they have selected Stuyvesant as their #1 choice among the specialized high schools. There are no controls for the race or gender of who gets in. Admission is based entirely on test scores, which is why Stuy is "the Ultimate Meritocracy"

Stuy Alum 2000 (not verified) says:

I was there when Teitel became Principal. We suddenly went from being respected and treated like adults to feeling as though we were living in a police state. I'm sure he has his merits and his reasons for being principal, but in terms of morale and the feelings of being self-sufficient and self-directed Stuy kids once had, he's really brought it down. Bring back Jinx!

Pecos45 (not verified) says:

Wrong!!!
Newsweek magazine named Dallas, TX ISD's TAG Magnet the best high school in America, two years in a row.
Read it and weep you d*mn Yankees!!!!

Pecos45 (not verified) says:

Wrong!!!
Newsweek magazine named Dallas, TX ISD's TAG Magnet the best high school in America, two years in a row.
Read it and weep you d*mn Yankees!!!!

Post a comment

The content of this field is kept private
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd><br> <p> <i> <b> <embed> <img> <blockquote> <span> <strikethrough> <u>
  • Use <!--pagebreak--> to create page breaks.

More information about formatting options

By checking this box you are giving permission for Observer staff to contact you to obtain contact information and permissions required for publication.