Epater Le Bébé!
A French author has finally declared baby backlash—when will fertility-frantic New York feminists follow suit?

The tots came at the rate of 63 an hour—or 1.05 a minute—gliding by in a haze of Pirate Booty and stroller dust.
It was a beautiful Wednesday afternoon in early October, and all up and down Park Slope’s Seventh Avenue, women were busy being mommies. There were a few nannies, and four fathers stumbled about. But mostly it was mothers—a solid 50 or so—dutifully juggling life and babies while managing to look at once earthy and graceful, not a Britney among them.
This is the good life for a certain caste of New York woman, the aspirational endpoint as brought to you by Maclaren and Cookie magazine. But watching the parade of moms it was hard not to wonder, at what point did child-bearing become such an inescapable component of the New York woman’s dream? And at what point did New York City, historic refuge for the quirky, carefree and childless, turn into a Den of Procreation?
“It’s like a cult,” said a 34-year-old not-yet-parent named Alison who works in advertising and lives with her husband in Lower Manhattan. “It’s like a cult, complete with the required reading, the clubs, the gurus, the dues, the inclusion, the excommunication, the hierarchy.
“And the pressure,” she continued, “starts in the missionary position.”
Raised on the old baby-versus-career debates, women of Alison’s generation always anticipated that the big discussion would be about if they wanted kids, not whether they planned to have three or even four. Certainly when they chose to settle in New York, a town that regularly undershot the national birth rate and was proud of it, they had reason to expect that they were not on the soccer-mom track.
But sometime during the past few years, something strange happened to these historically reticent reproducers. They freaked out, got busy and turned themselves into mascots for the new maternity. In just five years, between 2000 and 2005, the number of children under five living in Manhattan ballooned more than 32 percent, according to Census figures.
It probably didn’t help that in 2006 the Centers for Disease Control issued guidelines recommending that all women of childbearing age be considered “pre-pregnant,” chomp folic acid and avoid smoking. In 2001, the American Society of Reproductive Medicine launched a “protect your fertility” campaign, complete with posters of baby bottles in the shape of quickly draining hourglasses. Meanwhile, the fashion industry has been churning out empire-waist dresses and billowy blouses that make even the skinniest ingenues look like expectant mothers.
Somewhere along the way, the powerful feminist idea that having children was a choice disappeared into the trousseau chest.
Over in France, a similar fertility push, which has helped give that country the highest birthrate in Europe, has sparked something of a backlash in the form of a best-selling book by a writer and psychoanalyst (naturalement!) named Corinne Maier. Titled No Kid: 40 Reasons Not to Have Children, the book is part angry manifesto, part modest proposal urging adults—and above all women—to remain “without descendants.”
“No children, no thank you,” writes Ms. Maier, 43, in the conclusion of No Kid, which is currently being shopped to American publishers. “Women, the future of our country depends on you. The last freedom is to say, ‘I prefer not to.’”
Ms. Maier has caused quite a commotion in France, not the least because she already has two children of her own. (Talk about giving Junior a complex!) But No Kid has raised some valid questions, like, why are people so eager for women (particularly white, nonimmigrant women) to have babies these days? And why, when they do, does it have to be “the most beautiful thing in the world?”
“For women it’s compulsory, you have to be delighted,” Ms. Maier told The Observer in a phone conversation. “We have to work hard, be perfect and be ready,” she added, to sacrifice everything to raise the perfect child.
But back here, in radical old New York, there has been little public discussion among pre-pregnants of the rising pressure to procreate. In this age of “mom”-inism, where success is grand but motherhood is holy, women who declare they don’t want kids are considered self-haters or throwbacks. Next Page >






















Thank you, thank you, thank you. I was a 50's mom. Not by choice but by lack of effective birth control. Diaphragms, spermicide foam, and that good old standby "rhythm method". Yeah, right. Of course the MAN of the house refused to use condoms. Of course we are divorced and have been for 40+ years. I was a coward. I saw the results of many kitchen table abortions in those years. Massive infection, hemorrhage, and death. I caution young people newly married, or not, to wait to have children. Wait until you are sure of what you want out of this one time only life. I do not understand women who, upon being shown a new born drool, start spouting jibberish, declare "Oh, how beautiful" etc. ad nauseum. Now, I have three children and I love them. But....if I had had a choice, not then and not with that particular sperm donor and maybe never. So again, thanks for speaking out for the right of women not to have children. We are over 6 billion strong worldwide. Maybe a moritorium for a few years and we would not have starving and dying, abused children all over the world.
I completely agree with Alison's quote from the article. It does seem like a cult. I feel like "do you have kids" has become more prevalent that "what do you do" in day to day conversations and when I reply, "no," those conversations quickly stall. I have had more than one friend with kids tell me that I cannot have an opinion on certain issues because I don't have kids, and more and more it seems like kids are the only thing people want to talk about. I haven't made a final decision on procreation, but I am very tired of the idea that there is only one valid choice. Parents are always telling you how rewarding it is, but from the outside looking in most of them just look exhausted and frustrated.
I personally am tired of the oversimplification of feminism being defined by individualism (read if you want hubby and baby you are not a feminist, or if you want to just concentrate on yourself that you are). There is a bigger issue at stake here and that is the ultimate ability to choose - and being able to lead a happy life either direction you choose (single vs. married life, baby or no baby). Unfortunately, I think that people are both sides of the fence feel judged and very few (even the "conformists") get off feeling happy about their place in the world. I just wish we'd stop doing this to ourselves.
I say "Yeah!" to any Super Mom backlash. I don't have kids and find these people really offensive with their aggressive strollering, "baby on board" announcements on their cars, etc. It's narcissism run amok.
Once on the subway after being manhandled by an out of control toddler - her hands were in my hair and on my face - I expressed my displeasure in a low key way. Well, the mother was downright insulted that I didn't enjoy my encounter with her offspring and remarked, "Oh, I can tell you don't have children!" Damn right.
Loved the article – witty and well written! The tenant of the article was new to me since I never thought of having children as an “inescapable” component of the New York or any woman’s dream. I’ve definitely wanted children for as long as I can remember but never felt pressure to do so. I loved babysitting when I was a teen and always hoped I would be able to have children of my own. There are new pressures for today’s mom as stated by Ratner - complete with the required reading, the clubs, the gurus, the dues, the inclusion etc. and that IS stressful, but that came after the decision to have children – that’s the result of the over-informed, paxil-popping society we live in.
The advice from CDC was intended for women who might EVER consider the possibility of having a child, whether intentional or not (thus if you’re pro-life you probably want to heed CDC advice). If you’re pro-choice (as I am) no need to follow CDC advice, EXCEPT in the case that you think you may actually WANT to have a baby someday. The facts are as stated verbatim in the CDC report,
“Adverse pregnancy outcomes remain a prevalent health problem: 12% of babies are born premature, 8% are born with low birth weight, and 3% have major birth defects. Of women giving birth, 31% suffer pregnancy complications.” This is a major public health issue since these numbers could be lowered if preventive measures were followed by women who are A) Pro-life or B) Pro-Choice but open to having a baby someday whether planned or not. No need to think there is a government conspiracy to pressure women into having babies; they just want you to have the best chances for a healthy baby and pregnancy if you CHOOSE to do so.
I did not hope you waste too much money to buy the Arua ROSE zuly. Sorry, I left.